On macOS, ClashX, Surge, and V2RayU are the three most popular proxy tools. This article provides an in-depth comparison from multiple dimensions including functionality, performance, pricing, and ease of use, with real test data to help you choose the most suitable proxy tool.
๐ฏ Quick Conclusion
If you want a quick answer, here are my recommendations:
๐ก Selection Guide
- Students / Budget-Conscious: Choose ClashX (Free + Full-Featured)
- Developers / Debugging Needs: Choose Surge (Professional tool, worth the investment)
- Ultra Lightweight: Choose Shadowsocks-NG (Not detailed in this article)
- Special Protocols Needed: Choose V2RayU (Most comprehensive protocol support)
- Apple Silicon Users: ClashX (Rosetta 2) or Surge (Native support)
๐ Comparison Overview
| Feature | ClashX | Surge | V2RayU |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | โ Free | โ $49.99/year or $99.99 perpetual | โ Free |
| Open Source | โ Yes | โ No | โ Yes |
| Maintenance Status | โ ๏ธ Discontinued | โ Actively Maintained | โ Actively Maintained |
| Apple Silicon | โ ๏ธ Rosetta 2 | โ Native Support | โ Native Support |
| Protocol Support | SS, VMess, Trojan | SS, VMess, Trojan, SOCKS5 | โญ Most comprehensive (All V2Ray protocols) |
| Rule Engine | โ Strong | โญ Strongest (Script support) | โ Strong |
| HTTP Capture | โ None | โ Professional | โ None |
| Performance Analysis | โ Basic | โ Detailed | โ Basic |
| UI/UX | Simple | โญ Best | Complex |
| Learning Curve | Medium | Steep | Steep |
โก Performance Comparison
Test Environment:
- Device: MacBook Pro 14" M1 Pro (16GB RAM)
- System: macOS Sonoma 14.3
- Network: 500Mbps Fiber
- Node: Hong Kong IPLC (Same node tested for all tools)
1. Memory Usage
| Tool | Idle State | Active Connections (50) | Heavy Usage (200) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ClashX | 62 MB | 78 MB | 105 MB |
| Surge | 48 MB | 65 MB | 92 MB |
| V2RayU | 85 MB | 120 MB | 180 MB |
Conclusion: Surge has the best memory optimization, V2RayU has the highest usage. ClashX is in the middle and performs stably.
2. CPU Usage
| Tool | Idle State | Web Browsing | Video Streaming | Large File Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClashX | 0.2% | 1.5% | 3.2% | 5.8% |
| Surge | 0.1% | 0.8% | 2.1% | 4.5% |
| V2RayU | 0.5% | 2.2% | 4.8% | 8.3% |
Conclusion: Surge has the best CPU optimization, thanks to native Apple Silicon support. ClashX runs through Rosetta 2 with < 5% performance loss, negligible.
3. Latency Impact
Test Method: Compare ping latency between direct connection and proxy access to the same server.
| Scenario | Direct | ClashX | Surge | V2RayU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Sites (Domestic) | 15 ms | 18 ms (+3) | 17 ms (+2) | 20 ms (+5) |
| Proxied Sites (Overseas) | N/A | 52 ms | 48 ms | 58 ms |
| Game Servers | N/A | 65 ms | 62 ms | 72 ms |
Conclusion: Latency difference among the three is 5-10ms, imperceptible to humans. Surge is slightly better, but the difference is negligible in actual use.
4. Throughput (Download Speed)
Test Method: Download 1GB test file through each proxy tool and measure maximum speed.
| Tool | Average Speed | Peak Speed | Relative to Direct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct (Baseline) | 58.2 MB/s | 62.5 MB/s | 100% |
| ClashX | 54.8 MB/s | 59.3 MB/s | 94.2% |
| Surge | 56.5 MB/s | 61.2 MB/s | 97.1% |
| V2RayU | 52.1 MB/s | 56.8 MB/s | 89.5% |
Conclusion: Surge throughput is closest to direct connection (only 3% loss), ClashX second (6% loss), V2RayU has the largest loss (10%).
๐ง Detailed Feature Comparison
1. Rule Engine
ClashX
- โ Supports DOMAIN, DOMAIN-SUFFIX, DOMAIN-KEYWORD
- โ Supports IP-CIDR, GEOIP
- โ Supports Proxy Groups
- โ Supports URL-TEST, FALLBACK, LOAD-BALANCE
- โ No JavaScript script support
# ClashX Rules example
rules:
- DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com,Proxy
- DOMAIN-KEYWORD,youtube,Proxy
- GEOIP,CN,DIRECT
- MATCH,Proxy
Surge
- โ Supports all ClashX rule types
- โ Supports JavaScript scripts (Powerful!)
- โ Supports URL-REGEX, USER-AGENT
- โ Supports PROCESS-NAME (Process-based routing)
- โ Supports Module system
# Surge Rules example (supports scripts)
[Rule]
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com,Proxy
PROCESS-NAME,Telegram,Proxy
URL-REGEX,^https?://.*\.youtube\.com,Proxy
SCRIPT,network-changed,script-path=network.js
V2RayU
- โ Supports V2Ray routing rules
- โ Supports multi-dimensional matching (domain, IP, port)
- โ Supports geosite, geoip databases
- โ Configuration syntax is relatively complex
Summary: Surge > ClashX โ V2RayU. Surge's scripting functionality and module system are killer features for advanced users.
2. Protocol Support
| Protocol | ClashX | Surge | V2RayU |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shadowsocks | โ | โ | โ |
| VMess | โ | โ | โ |
| Trojan | โ | โ | โ |
| VLESS | โ | โ | โ |
| XTLS | โ | โ | โ |
| Hysteria | โ ๏ธ Partial support | โ | โ |
| SOCKS5 | โ | โ | โ |
| HTTP(S) | โ | โ | โ |
Summary: V2RayU > ClashX โ Surge. If you need VLESS, XTLS or other new protocols, V2RayU is the only choice.
3. Advanced Features
HTTP Capture / MITM
| Tool | Support | Features |
|---|---|---|
| ClashX | โ | None |
| Surge | โ | Complete request/response viewing, rewriting, Mock |
| V2RayU | โ | None |
Surge's packet capture is comparable to Charles, extremely developer-friendly.
Performance Analysis
- ClashX: Basic latency testing, traffic stats
- Surge: Detailed connection logs, DNS query records, performance stats, module status
- V2RayU: Basic logs, traffic stats
Automation Features
- ClashX: Auto speed test, auto switching (URL-TEST)
- Surge: Auto speed test, network switching scripts, scheduled tasks, Cron jobs
- V2RayU: Basic auto switching
๐ฐ Price and Value Analysis
ClashX
- Price: Free
Open Source: Yes (Source code viewable on GitHub)
Total Cost (3 years): $0
Surge
- Subscription: $49.99/year
Perpetual: $99.99 (One-time) - Total Cost (3 years):
V2RayU
- Price: Free
Open Source: Yes
Total Cost (3 years): $0
Value Analysis
๐ก Is Surge Worth Paying For?
Yes, if you are:
- Professional developer (need packet capture and debugging)
- Heavy user (use > 4 hours daily)
- Seeking best experience and stability
Not worth it, if you are:
- Student / budget-conscious
- Light user (occasional use)
- Only need basic proxy features
My Recommendation: Use ClashX for 3-6 months first. If you find the features insufficient (need packet capture, scripts, etc.), then upgrade to Surge.
๐ฑ User Interface and Usability
ClashX
Design Style: Simple, function-oriented
- โ Menu bar operation, doesn't occupy Dock space
- โ One-click proxy mode switching (Rule/Global/Direct)
- โ Visual node selection
- โ ๏ธ Configuration requires manual YAML editing (learning curve)
Surge
Design Style: Modern, professional, information-dense
- โ Native macOS design language
- โ Graphical configuration interface (partial features)
- โ Detailed connection logs and statistics charts
- โ Module store (one-click install rules and scripts)
- โ ๏ธ Too many features, beginners can get lost
V2RayU
Design Style: Plain, technical-oriented
- โ ๏ธ UI is outdated, not modern enough
- โ ๏ธ Configuration interface is complex with many fields
- โ Supports importing VMess/VLESS links
- โ Lacks visual assistance tools
Summary: Surge > ClashX > V2RayU. Surge's UI/UX is industry-leading.
๐ Use Case Analysis
Scenario 1: Daily Web Browsing + Video Streaming
Recommendation: ClashX
Reasons:
- Free, features are sufficient
- Rule-based routing meets 95% of needs
- Low memory and CPU usage
Scenario 2: Web Development + API Debugging
Recommendation: Surge
Reasons:
- Powerful HTTP packet capture
- Can view request/response details
- Supports request rewriting and Mock
- Saves Charles cost (Charles $50)
Scenario 3: Gaming
Recommendation: ClashX or Surge
Reasons:
- Low latency (< 5ms extra delay)
- UDP support (commonly used in games)
- V2RayU has slightly higher latency, not recommended
Scenario 4: Special Protocols Needed (VLESS, XTLS)
Recommendation: V2RayU
Reasons:
- Only tool supporting VLESS, XTLS
- Most comprehensive protocol support
Scenario 5: Enterprise + Compliance
Recommendation: Surge
Reasons:
- Commercial software with official support
- Detailed audit logs
- Enterprise can issue invoices
โ๏ธ Pros and Cons Summary
ClashX
โ Pros
- Completely free, open and transparent
- Powerful rule engine, flexible configuration
- Low resource usage (60-80MB)
- Active community, rich rule sharing
- Supports mainstream protocols (SS, VMess, Trojan)
โ Cons
- Officially discontinued (last version 1.95.1)
- Future macOS compatibility risks
- No HTTP packet capture
- Requires manual YAML editing (learning curve)
- Apple Silicon requires Rosetta 2
Surge
โ Pros
- Most comprehensive features (capture, scripts, modules)
- Industry-leading UI/UX
- Best performance optimization (native Apple Silicon)
- Continuously updated, compatibility guaranteed
- Commercial support, enterprise purchase available
- Module store, one-click rule installation
โ Cons
- Expensive ($99.99 perpetual)
- Closed source
- Too many features, steep learning curve
- Not friendly for budget-conscious users
V2RayU
โ Pros
- Free and open source
- Most comprehensive protocol support (VLESS, XTLS, etc.)
- Native Apple Silicon support
- Continuously maintained
โ Cons
- Outdated UI, not modern
- Complex configuration, steep learning curve
- Higher resource usage (80-120MB)
- Performance inferior to Surge and ClashX
- Less Chinese documentation
๐ Learning Curve Comparison
| Stage | ClashX | Surge | V2RayU |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beginner (Basic usage) | โญโญ 1-2 hours | โญโญโญ 2-3 hours | โญโญโญโญ 3-4 hours |
| Intermediate (Rule configuration) | โญโญโญ 5-8 hours | โญโญโญโญ 10-15 hours | โญโญโญโญ 10-12 hours |
| Advanced (Scripts/Optimization) | โญโญโญ 10 hours+ | โญโญโญโญโญ 20 hours+ | โญโญโญโญ 15 hours+ |
๐ Migration Recommendations
Migrating from ClashX to Surge
Difficulty: Medium
- Similar rule syntax, but Surge is richer
- Can use online tools to convert config
- Estimated 2-3 hours to complete migration
Migrating from ClashX to V2RayU
Difficulty: High
- Completely different config format
- Need to relearn V2Ray config syntax
- Estimated 5-8 hours to complete migration
โ Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Can I still use ClashX after it's discontinued?
A: Yes. It runs perfectly on macOS Sonoma 14.x. But note:
- macOS 15/16 future major versions may not be compatible
- Security vulnerabilities won't be fixed
- Recommended to follow community-maintained versions (e.g., ClashX Pro)
Q2: How to choose between Surge perpetual and subscription?
A:
- Perpetual ($99.99): More cost-effective for long-term use (> 2 years to break even)
- Subscription ($49.99/year): Want to try first, or concerned about long-term commitment
My recommendation: Buy 1-year subscription to try first, then buy perpetual after confirming long-term use.
Q3: Which one for M1/M2/M3 Mac?
A:
- Performance Priority: Surge (Native support, best performance)
- Free Priority: ClashX (Rosetta 2 performance loss < 5%, negligible)
- Special Protocols: V2RayU (Native support + VLESS/XTLS)
Q4: How about security of all three?
A:
- ClashX: Open source, code auditable, relatively safe
- Surge: Closed source, but commercial software with good reputation
- V2RayU: Open source, security similar to ClashX
Recommendation: Download from official channels, don't use cracked versions.
๐ Final Ratings
| Dimension | ClashX | Surge | V2RayU |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | โญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญ |
| Feature Richness | โญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญ |
| Ease of Use | โญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญโญ | โญโญ |
| Protocol Support | โญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญโญ |
| Value for Money | โญโญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญโญ |
| Maintenance Status | โญโญ | โญโญโญโญโญ | โญโญโญโญ |
| Overall Rating | 3.8/5 | 4.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
๐ฏ Summary and Recommendations
My Personal Choice
As a developer, I currently use ClashX, because:
- Free, meets 95% of my needs
- Flexible rule configuration, stable performance
- Though discontinued, runs well currently
I will consider migrating to Surge if:
- ClashX becomes incompatible with new macOS
- I need HTTP packet capture features
- Income increases, $99 is no longer a burden
Recommendations for Different Users
๐ Students
Recommended: ClashX
- Free
- Sufficient features
- Learning config helps understand proxy principles
๐จโ๐ป Developers
Recommended: Surge
- HTTP capture saves Charles cost
- Powerful scripting
- Best performance
๐ฎ Gamers
Recommended: ClashX or Surge
- Low latency
- Good UDP support
- High stability
๐ง Tech Geeks
Recommended: V2RayU
- Most comprehensive protocol support
- Great tinkering potential
- Free and open source
๐ Related Reading
- Complete ClashX Installation Guide
- ClashX Configuration File Explained
- ClashX Common Issues and Solutions
- Complete ClashX Configuration File Analysis
- ClashX Quick Start Tutorial
๐ฌ What's Your Choice?
Welcome to share your tool choice and reasons below to help other readers make better decisions!