ClashX vs Surge vs V2RayU: In-Depth Comparison of macOS Proxy Tools 2025

Article 12 cover image

On macOS, ClashX, Surge, and V2RayU are the three most popular proxy tools. This article provides an in-depth comparison from multiple dimensions including functionality, performance, pricing, and ease of use, with real test data to help you choose the most suitable proxy tool.

๐ŸŽฏ Quick Conclusion

If you want a quick answer, here are my recommendations:

๐Ÿ’ก Selection Guide

  • Students / Budget-Conscious: Choose ClashX (Free + Full-Featured)
  • Developers / Debugging Needs: Choose Surge (Professional tool, worth the investment)
  • Ultra Lightweight: Choose Shadowsocks-NG (Not detailed in this article)
  • Special Protocols Needed: Choose V2RayU (Most comprehensive protocol support)
  • Apple Silicon Users: ClashX (Rosetta 2) or Surge (Native support)

๐Ÿ“Š Comparison Overview

Feature ClashX Surge V2RayU
Price โœ… Free โŒ $49.99/year or $99.99 perpetual โœ… Free
Open Source โœ… Yes โŒ No โœ… Yes
Maintenance Status โš ๏ธ Discontinued โœ… Actively Maintained โœ… Actively Maintained
Apple Silicon โš ๏ธ Rosetta 2 โœ… Native Support โœ… Native Support
Protocol Support SS, VMess, Trojan SS, VMess, Trojan, SOCKS5 โญ Most comprehensive (All V2Ray protocols)
Rule Engine โœ… Strong โญ Strongest (Script support) โœ… Strong
HTTP Capture โŒ None โœ… Professional โŒ None
Performance Analysis โŒ Basic โœ… Detailed โŒ Basic
UI/UX Simple โญ Best Complex
Learning Curve Medium Steep Steep

โšก Performance Comparison

Test Environment:

  • Device: MacBook Pro 14" M1 Pro (16GB RAM)
  • System: macOS Sonoma 14.3
  • Network: 500Mbps Fiber
  • Node: Hong Kong IPLC (Same node tested for all tools)

1. Memory Usage

Tool Idle State Active Connections (50) Heavy Usage (200)
ClashX 62 MB 78 MB 105 MB
Surge 48 MB 65 MB 92 MB
V2RayU 85 MB 120 MB 180 MB

Conclusion: Surge has the best memory optimization, V2RayU has the highest usage. ClashX is in the middle and performs stably.

2. CPU Usage

Tool Idle State Web Browsing Video Streaming Large File Download
ClashX 0.2% 1.5% 3.2% 5.8%
Surge 0.1% 0.8% 2.1% 4.5%
V2RayU 0.5% 2.2% 4.8% 8.3%

Conclusion: Surge has the best CPU optimization, thanks to native Apple Silicon support. ClashX runs through Rosetta 2 with < 5% performance loss, negligible.

3. Latency Impact

Test Method: Compare ping latency between direct connection and proxy access to the same server.

Scenario Direct ClashX Surge V2RayU
Local Sites (Domestic) 15 ms 18 ms (+3) 17 ms (+2) 20 ms (+5)
Proxied Sites (Overseas) N/A 52 ms 48 ms 58 ms
Game Servers N/A 65 ms 62 ms 72 ms

Conclusion: Latency difference among the three is 5-10ms, imperceptible to humans. Surge is slightly better, but the difference is negligible in actual use.

4. Throughput (Download Speed)

Test Method: Download 1GB test file through each proxy tool and measure maximum speed.

Tool Average Speed Peak Speed Relative to Direct
Direct (Baseline) 58.2 MB/s 62.5 MB/s 100%
ClashX 54.8 MB/s 59.3 MB/s 94.2%
Surge 56.5 MB/s 61.2 MB/s 97.1%
V2RayU 52.1 MB/s 56.8 MB/s 89.5%

Conclusion: Surge throughput is closest to direct connection (only 3% loss), ClashX second (6% loss), V2RayU has the largest loss (10%).

๐Ÿ”ง Detailed Feature Comparison

1. Rule Engine

ClashX

  • โœ… Supports DOMAIN, DOMAIN-SUFFIX, DOMAIN-KEYWORD
  • โœ… Supports IP-CIDR, GEOIP
  • โœ… Supports Proxy Groups
  • โœ… Supports URL-TEST, FALLBACK, LOAD-BALANCE
  • โŒ No JavaScript script support
# ClashX Rules example
rules:
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com,Proxy
  - DOMAIN-KEYWORD,youtube,Proxy
  - GEOIP,CN,DIRECT
  - MATCH,Proxy

Surge

  • โœ… Supports all ClashX rule types
  • โœ… Supports JavaScript scripts (Powerful!)
  • โœ… Supports URL-REGEX, USER-AGENT
  • โœ… Supports PROCESS-NAME (Process-based routing)
  • โœ… Supports Module system
# Surge Rules example (supports scripts)
[Rule]
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com,Proxy
PROCESS-NAME,Telegram,Proxy
URL-REGEX,^https?://.*\.youtube\.com,Proxy
SCRIPT,network-changed,script-path=network.js

V2RayU

  • โœ… Supports V2Ray routing rules
  • โœ… Supports multi-dimensional matching (domain, IP, port)
  • โœ… Supports geosite, geoip databases
  • โŒ Configuration syntax is relatively complex

Summary: Surge > ClashX โ‰ˆ V2RayU. Surge's scripting functionality and module system are killer features for advanced users.

2. Protocol Support

Protocol ClashX Surge V2RayU
Shadowsocks โœ… โœ… โœ…
VMess โœ… โœ… โœ…
Trojan โœ… โœ… โœ…
VLESS โŒ โŒ โœ…
XTLS โŒ โŒ โœ…
Hysteria โš ๏ธ Partial support โŒ โœ…
SOCKS5 โœ… โœ… โœ…
HTTP(S) โœ… โœ… โœ…

Summary: V2RayU > ClashX โ‰ˆ Surge. If you need VLESS, XTLS or other new protocols, V2RayU is the only choice.

3. Advanced Features

HTTP Capture / MITM

Tool Support Features
ClashX โŒ None
Surge โœ… Complete request/response viewing, rewriting, Mock
V2RayU โŒ None

Surge's packet capture is comparable to Charles, extremely developer-friendly.

Performance Analysis

  • ClashX: Basic latency testing, traffic stats
  • Surge: Detailed connection logs, DNS query records, performance stats, module status
  • V2RayU: Basic logs, traffic stats

Automation Features

  • ClashX: Auto speed test, auto switching (URL-TEST)
  • Surge: Auto speed test, network switching scripts, scheduled tasks, Cron jobs
  • V2RayU: Basic auto switching

๐Ÿ’ฐ Price and Value Analysis

ClashX

  • Price: Free
    Open Source: Yes (Source code viewable on GitHub)
    Total Cost (3 years): $0

Surge

  • Subscription: $49.99/year
    Perpetual: $99.99 (One-time)
  • Total Cost (3 years):

V2RayU

  • Price: Free
    Open Source: Yes
    Total Cost (3 years): $0

Value Analysis

๐Ÿ’ก Is Surge Worth Paying For?

Yes, if you are:

  • Professional developer (need packet capture and debugging)
  • Heavy user (use > 4 hours daily)
  • Seeking best experience and stability

Not worth it, if you are:

  • Student / budget-conscious
  • Light user (occasional use)
  • Only need basic proxy features

My Recommendation: Use ClashX for 3-6 months first. If you find the features insufficient (need packet capture, scripts, etc.), then upgrade to Surge.

๐Ÿ“ฑ User Interface and Usability

ClashX

Design Style: Simple, function-oriented

  • โœ… Menu bar operation, doesn't occupy Dock space
  • โœ… One-click proxy mode switching (Rule/Global/Direct)
  • โœ… Visual node selection
  • โš ๏ธ Configuration requires manual YAML editing (learning curve)

Surge

Design Style: Modern, professional, information-dense

  • โœ… Native macOS design language
  • โœ… Graphical configuration interface (partial features)
  • โœ… Detailed connection logs and statistics charts
  • โœ… Module store (one-click install rules and scripts)
  • โš ๏ธ Too many features, beginners can get lost

V2RayU

Design Style: Plain, technical-oriented

  • โš ๏ธ UI is outdated, not modern enough
  • โš ๏ธ Configuration interface is complex with many fields
  • โœ… Supports importing VMess/VLESS links
  • โŒ Lacks visual assistance tools

Summary: Surge > ClashX > V2RayU. Surge's UI/UX is industry-leading.

๐Ÿ” Use Case Analysis

Scenario 1: Daily Web Browsing + Video Streaming

Recommendation: ClashX

Reasons:

  • Free, features are sufficient
  • Rule-based routing meets 95% of needs
  • Low memory and CPU usage

Scenario 2: Web Development + API Debugging

Recommendation: Surge

Reasons:

  • Powerful HTTP packet capture
  • Can view request/response details
  • Supports request rewriting and Mock
  • Saves Charles cost (Charles $50)

Scenario 3: Gaming

Recommendation: ClashX or Surge

Reasons:

  • Low latency (< 5ms extra delay)
  • UDP support (commonly used in games)
  • V2RayU has slightly higher latency, not recommended

Scenario 4: Special Protocols Needed (VLESS, XTLS)

Recommendation: V2RayU

Reasons:

  • Only tool supporting VLESS, XTLS
  • Most comprehensive protocol support

Scenario 5: Enterprise + Compliance

Recommendation: Surge

Reasons:

  • Commercial software with official support
  • Detailed audit logs
  • Enterprise can issue invoices

โš–๏ธ Pros and Cons Summary

ClashX

โœ… Pros

  • Completely free, open and transparent
  • Powerful rule engine, flexible configuration
  • Low resource usage (60-80MB)
  • Active community, rich rule sharing
  • Supports mainstream protocols (SS, VMess, Trojan)

โŒ Cons

  • Officially discontinued (last version 1.95.1)
  • Future macOS compatibility risks
  • No HTTP packet capture
  • Requires manual YAML editing (learning curve)
  • Apple Silicon requires Rosetta 2

Surge

โœ… Pros

  • Most comprehensive features (capture, scripts, modules)
  • Industry-leading UI/UX
  • Best performance optimization (native Apple Silicon)
  • Continuously updated, compatibility guaranteed
  • Commercial support, enterprise purchase available
  • Module store, one-click rule installation

โŒ Cons

  • Expensive ($99.99 perpetual)
  • Closed source
  • Too many features, steep learning curve
  • Not friendly for budget-conscious users

V2RayU

โœ… Pros

  • Free and open source
  • Most comprehensive protocol support (VLESS, XTLS, etc.)
  • Native Apple Silicon support
  • Continuously maintained

โŒ Cons

  • Outdated UI, not modern
  • Complex configuration, steep learning curve
  • Higher resource usage (80-120MB)
  • Performance inferior to Surge and ClashX
  • Less Chinese documentation

๐ŸŽ“ Learning Curve Comparison

Stage ClashX Surge V2RayU
Beginner (Basic usage) โญโญ 1-2 hours โญโญโญ 2-3 hours โญโญโญโญ 3-4 hours
Intermediate (Rule configuration) โญโญโญ 5-8 hours โญโญโญโญ 10-15 hours โญโญโญโญ 10-12 hours
Advanced (Scripts/Optimization) โญโญโญ 10 hours+ โญโญโญโญโญ 20 hours+ โญโญโญโญ 15 hours+

๐Ÿš€ Migration Recommendations

Migrating from ClashX to Surge

Difficulty: Medium

  • Similar rule syntax, but Surge is richer
  • Can use online tools to convert config
  • Estimated 2-3 hours to complete migration

Migrating from ClashX to V2RayU

Difficulty: High

  • Completely different config format
  • Need to relearn V2Ray config syntax
  • Estimated 5-8 hours to complete migration

โ“ Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can I still use ClashX after it's discontinued?

A: Yes. It runs perfectly on macOS Sonoma 14.x. But note:

  • macOS 15/16 future major versions may not be compatible
  • Security vulnerabilities won't be fixed
  • Recommended to follow community-maintained versions (e.g., ClashX Pro)

Q2: How to choose between Surge perpetual and subscription?

A:

  • Perpetual ($99.99): More cost-effective for long-term use (> 2 years to break even)
  • Subscription ($49.99/year): Want to try first, or concerned about long-term commitment

My recommendation: Buy 1-year subscription to try first, then buy perpetual after confirming long-term use.

Q3: Which one for M1/M2/M3 Mac?

A:

  • Performance Priority: Surge (Native support, best performance)
  • Free Priority: ClashX (Rosetta 2 performance loss < 5%, negligible)
  • Special Protocols: V2RayU (Native support + VLESS/XTLS)

Q4: How about security of all three?

A:

  • ClashX: Open source, code auditable, relatively safe
  • Surge: Closed source, but commercial software with good reputation
  • V2RayU: Open source, security similar to ClashX

Recommendation: Download from official channels, don't use cracked versions.

๐Ÿ“Š Final Ratings

Dimension ClashX Surge V2RayU
Performance โญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ โญโญโญ
Feature Richness โญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญ
Ease of Use โญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ โญโญ
Protocol Support โญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ
Value for Money โญโญโญโญโญ โญโญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ
Maintenance Status โญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญ
Overall Rating 3.8/5 4.5/5 3.5/5

๐ŸŽฏ Summary and Recommendations

My Personal Choice

As a developer, I currently use ClashX, because:

  • Free, meets 95% of my needs
  • Flexible rule configuration, stable performance
  • Though discontinued, runs well currently

I will consider migrating to Surge if:

  • ClashX becomes incompatible with new macOS
  • I need HTTP packet capture features
  • Income increases, $99 is no longer a burden

Recommendations for Different Users

๐ŸŽ“ Students

Recommended: ClashX

  • Free
  • Sufficient features
  • Learning config helps understand proxy principles

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป Developers

Recommended: Surge

  • HTTP capture saves Charles cost
  • Powerful scripting
  • Best performance

๐ŸŽฎ Gamers

Recommended: ClashX or Surge

  • Low latency
  • Good UDP support
  • High stability

๐Ÿ”ง Tech Geeks

Recommended: V2RayU

  • Most comprehensive protocol support
  • Great tinkering potential
  • Free and open source

๐Ÿ”— Related Reading

๐Ÿ’ฌ What's Your Choice?

Welcome to share your tool choice and reasons below to help other readers make better decisions!