Сравнение

ClashX vs Surge 2025 Review: Features, Pricing, and Производительность

📅 2026-02-10 15 мин чтения

macOS ，ClashX Surge 。Freeс открытым исходным кодом，features。？ 8 ，。

💡
Заключение

ClashX freeс открытым исходным кодом、features；Surge ，features。budget， ClashX；featuresbudget， Surge。

⚡

，:

...
Dimension ClashX Surge
Price ✓ Free 99 /
с открытым исходным кодом ✓ Open-source ✗ Closed-source
features ⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
производительность Excellent (~50MB RAM) Good (~90MB RAM)
clashxVsSurge.quick-comparison.auto.td7 Легко Steep
MITM Features ✗ Not supported ✓ Fully supported

💰 Pricing & value comparison

ClashX: полностью бесплатно

  • macOS build: Totally free with zero restrictions
  • Feature limits: All core capabilities unlocked at no cost
  • Updates: Ongoing free releases backed by the community
  • Hidden fees: None
  • Open-source perks: Transparent code, compile it yourself

Surge: подписка-based

  • macOS build: About ¥99/year подписка
  • iOS build: About ¥99/year (sold separately)
  • Lifetime buy: One-time license available (higher price)
  • Trial: Limited-time evaluation provided
  • Cross-platform cost: macOS + iOS ≈ ¥198/year

Value analysis

📊
Value verdict

ClashX: Best value—zero cost for roughly 80% of features. Ideal for budget-limited basic to intermediate users.

Surge: Great ROI for pros—¥99/year unlocks the full professional toolkit, perfect for developers and security engineers.

Suggested plan: Start with ClashX and only upgrade to Surge if you hit its limits; most people won’t need to.

🔧 Feature breakdown

Протокол support

Протокол type ClashX Surge
Shadowsocks (SS) ✓ ✓
ShadowsocksR (SSR) ✓ ✓
VMess ✓ ✓
VLESS ✓ ✓
Trojan ✓ ✓
Hysteria ✓ ✓
WireGuard - ✓

Takeaway: Surge edges ahead with extras like WireGuard, but ClashX already covers what most users need.

Rule engine comparison

ClashX движок правил
Flexible and powerful, supports domain, IP, GEOIP and more
Surge движок правил
Industry-leading with complex rule chains and scripting support

режим TUN

  • ClashX: System-wide режим TUN covers every app
  • Surge: More refined TUN stack with better stability and options
  • Verdict: Minimal difference for daily use; Surge handles edge cases better

DNS оптимизация

  • ClashX: Supports Fake-IP and Redir-Host with solid DNS splitting
  • Surge: Adds DoH, DoT, and fully custom DNS серверы
  • Verdict: Casual users won’t notice a gap, but Surge gives experts more toggles

⚡ производительность

: MacBook Pro 14" M2 Pro, macOS 14.0,

память usage

clashxVsSurge.performance.auto.th1 ClashX Surge
clashxVsSurge.performance.auto.td1 32 MB 58 MB
clashxVsSurge.performance.auto.td2 48 MB 92 MB
clashxVsSurge.performance.auto.td3 72 MB 156 MB

: ClashX память usagelower，。

CPU

  • ClashX: 0.2%， 1-3%， 5%
  • Surge: 0.5%， 3-5%， 8%
  • : ClashX ，CPU lower

connection speed

  • : ClashX 320ms，Surge 380ms
  • : ，
  • :
  • :
🏆
performanceConclusion

ClashX производительность，， Mac 。Surge ，，features。

👥 usability

clashxVsSurge.usability.auto.h3_1

ClashX
，，
Surge
，features

clashxVsSurge.usability.auto.h3_2

  • ClashX: ， YAML ，
  • Surge: ， Surge ，
  • : ClashX 1-2 ，Surge 5-10

clashxVsSurge.usability.auto.h3_3

  • ClashX: ，，GitHub Issues
  • Surge: ，
  • : ClashX ，

error

  • ClashX: ，
  • Surge: ，
  • : ClashX ， Surge

🚀 features

Surge features

  • MITM : ，interceptionmodification HTTPS requests，
  • JavaScript : ，
  • : Cron ，
  • requests: URL 、Header modification、modification
  • : requests
  • : iCloud

ClashX features

  • с открытым исходным кодом: ，，
  • : ，Rule providers
  • : ，
  • : GitHub 30k+，
  • : ，
⚠️
features

MITM、packet capture、features，Surge 。、、，ClashX features。

🎯 use cases

ClashX

✅
ClashX
  • budget: 、，
  • : с открытым исходным кодом，
  • : 、、
  • : ，
  • : SS、VMess、Trojan
  • производительность: Mac

Surge

✅
Surge
  • : 、
  • : MITM packet capture、requestsinterceptionmodificationfeatures
  • :
  • :
  • budget: 99 /，
  • : macOS iOS，

clashxVsSurge.scenarios.auto.h3_3

recommended: ClashX + Surge

  • : free，
  • use cases: ClashX，packet capture Surge
  • : Surge (99 /)
  • : 、、

🔄 migration

ClashX Surge

:

  1. : ClashX
  2. : Clash Surge
  3. Surge: Surge
  4. :
  5. : Surge features

Surge ClashX

:

  • Surge MITM features ClashX
  • Surge
  • ，features
💡
clashxVsSurge.strong.migrationTip

，。， ()。

❓ FAQ

1. ClashX Surge？

: ，ClashX Surge。features， Surge:

  • MITM HTTPS interception
  • JavaScript
  • requests
  • Rule

2. Surge worth？

: budget:

  • worth: 、、features
  • : 、budget、
  • : ，99 /；，ClashX free

3. ？

: ，。

  • port conflictsnetwork issues
  • ( ClashX， Surge)
  • recommended，avoid conflicts

4. ？

:

  1. budget → ClashX
  2. MITM packet capture → Surge
  3. с открытым исходным кодом → ClashX
  4. → Surge
  5. → ClashX，

📝 Conclusion

🎯
clashxVsSurge.strong.quickDecision
  • ClashX: free、с открытым исходным кодом、、 (90% )
  • Surge: 、、、 (10% )
  • : ClashX + Surge (best value)

clashxVsSurge.conclusion.auto.h3_1

:

ClashX ，free、с открытым исходным кодом、features、производительность， 90% 。 ClashX features， Surge。

:

、， MITM、packet capture、features， Surge。99 /worth。

:

，。、budget，。

💡
clashxVsSurge.strong.threeTips

1. Try before buy: Surge trial period， 2. : ，， 3. : ，

适用人群结论块（1 分钟决策）

学生 / 预算有限
ClashX
开发调试 / MITM
Surge
双场景用户
日常 ClashX + 调试 Surge
📌
执行建议

先用 ClashX 建立稳定基线，再按具体调试需求补充 Surge，通常比直接全量迁移更省时间和成本。

Теги: ClashX vs Surge Сравнение macOS прокси-инструментs tag.2026review

Похожие статьи